What four experiments taught me about model personality

A practical experiment in classifying model personalities and assigning them to planner, reviewer, and executor roles

Most people who use more than one frontier model eventually learn that models have different task strengths. One model is better for fast edits. Another is better for long-form reasoning. Another is better for exhaustive review. That part is not especially surprising anymore.

What I wanted to test was more specific: whether those differences could be described as personality. Not personality in the human sense, but a repeatable instinct that shows up across tasks. If that instinct can be named, tested, and connected to failure modes, then model selection becomes less vibes-based.

[Read More]